Please wait a minute...
水泥技术, 2018, 1(2): 31-35    
  实验研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
水泥窑协同处置危险废物典型污染物在水泥熟料中的固化研究
1 溧阳中材环保有限公司   2 中材国际环境工程(北京)有限公司
Study of Typical Pollutants' Solidification in Clinker in the Co-processing Hazardous Waste in Cement Kiln
1. Sinoma Liyang Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. 
2. Sinoma International Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd. 
下载:  PDF (1735KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 分别考察了处置含Cr、Pb和Cl等三种典型污染物的危险废物时,这三种污染物在熟料中的固化情况,发现随着处置量的增加,Cr和Pb在熟料中的固化率随之增加,Cl在熟料中的固化率随之下降。检测了在协同处置上述三种危险废物时的熟料质量情况,发现游离钙含量、熟料三率值和28d强度均能满足相关标准要求。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
嵇磊
赵旭红
曹培
赵宇
孙鹤
黄永胜
韦娟
张广芳
俞刚
吴德厚
关键词:  水泥窑协同处置  危险废物  典型污染物  固化率    
Abstract: Hazardous wastes containing three typical pollutants such as Cr, Pb and Cl were co-processed in cement kiln,simultaneously the curing rates in clinker were respectively examined.The results showedthat the curing rate of Cr, Pb raised when the hazardous waste disposal amounts increased, except the curing rate of Cl declined when the hazardous waste disposal amounts increased. The quality of the clinker was detected during the co-processing.The results showedthat the fCaOrate values and 28d strength of clinker could satisfy the related standards.
Key words:  cement kiln co-processing    hazardous wastes    typical pollutants    curing rate
收稿日期:  2017-12-15                出版日期:  2018-03-25      发布日期:  2018-03-29      整期出版日期:  2018-03-25
TQ172.44  
引用本文:    
嵇磊, 赵旭红, 曹培, 赵宇, 孙鹤, 黄永胜, 韦娟, 张广芳, 俞刚, 吴德厚, . 水泥窑协同处置危险废物典型污染物在水泥熟料中的固化研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(2): 31-35.
JI Lei, ZHAO Xuhong, CAO Pei, ZHAO Yu, SUN He, HUANG Yongsheng, WEI Juan, ZHANG Guangfang, YU Gang, WU De Hou, . Study of Typical Pollutants' Solidification in Clinker in the Co-processing Hazardous Waste in Cement Kiln. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(2): 31-35.
链接本文:  
http://www.cemteck.com/CN/  或          http://www.cemteck.com/CN/Y2018/V1/I2/31
[1] 赵晓东.
熔渣用于生产水泥的试验研究与生产实践
[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(3): 34-37.
[2] 何胜平, 孙国玉. 电石渣制水泥的烧成技术研究与实践[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(2): 91-93.
[3] 高长明. 我国水泥窑协同处置废弃物工程实践的回顾与展望[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(1): 17-21.
[4] 郑旭, 刘晨, 颜碧兰, 王昕, 魏丽颖. 对比水泥对粒化高炉矿渣粉性能检测结果的影响研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2017, 1(6): 30-39.
[5] 林发尧. 采用电石渣配料降低烟气硫排放[J]. 水泥技术, 2017, 1(4): 78-81.
[6] 吴东业. 水泥厂电石渣圆库安全设施设计的探讨[J]. 水泥技术, 2017, 1(4): 31-35.
[7] 吴长亮, 李艳君, 李大伟, 刘晓存. 一种矾土尾矿渣作水泥混合材的试验研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2017, 1(2): 29-34.
[8] 吴永哲, 陈学勇, 胡龙.
Single-bar型滑架装置在水泥窑协同处置污泥项目中的应用
[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(6): 43-44.
[9] 李虎臣, 刘乔, 高伟强.
水泥窑协同处置污泥和水泥物料中汞元素的测定方法研究
[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(6): 34-36.
[10] 张爱全. 钢渣性能及其在水泥中的应用研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(5): 35-39.
[11] 宋留庆, 王峰, 聂文海, 柴星腾, 朱锋. 辊磨粉磨镍铁渣粉用作混凝土掺合料的性能研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(2): 28-30.
[12] 张冠军, 李涛, 詹楠, 刘磊磊. 利用钡盐废渣烧制高强度熟料的研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(2): 35-37.
[13] 孙文东, 王明治, 高婷婷. 浅谈高掺量粉煤灰水泥粉磨系统调试[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(1): 39-42.
[14] 董恒恒, 张友平, 苏义德. 浅谈电石渣制水泥干粉秤系统稳流改造[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(1): 79-80.
[15] 鲁建军, 徐昕, 郭中坚.
化成箔废渣制备硫铝酸盐水泥熟料的研究
[J]. 水泥技术, 2015, 1(4): 32-33.
[1] . Review and Prospect of Engineering Practice of Waste Disposal in Cement Kiln in China[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 17 -21 .
[2] DI Dongren, TAO Congxi, CHAI Xingteng. Revision of Cement Energy Consumption Standards and Energy Saving Technology(Ⅰ)[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 22 -26 .
[3] LIU Yonggang, GAO Hongwei, XIAO Guiqing. Design Method of Road Structure Using Lean Concrete Base[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 27 -31 .
[4] LIU Xu, LI Liang. Investigation of New Medium Temperature Wear-resistant Alloy Steel[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 32 -34 .
[5] MA Debao. Finite Element Analysis of Inverted Cone in Raw Meal Silo[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 35 -38 .
[6] HAN Zhongqi. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 38 -48 .
[7] XIE Jianzhong, LIAN Xuewen. Analysis and Solution of Segregation of the Kiln Ash in Continuous Raw Meal Homogenization Silo#br#[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 49 -53 .
[8] GUAN Laiqing, HE Yongxian. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 54 -59 .
[9] WEI Can, ZHANG Yuanyuan, AI Jun. Application of Cement Intelligent Control System in Overseas Projects[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 60 -64 .
[10] JIN Shuang. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 72 -73 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
    PDF Preview