Please wait a minute...
水泥技术, 2015, 1(4): 92-95    
  工程技术 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中美设计规范下窑尾结构地震作用的对比分析
1天津水泥工业设计研究院有限公司 2武汉理工大学道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室
Comparison of Earthquake Action for Kiln Tail Structure between Chinese Code and USA Code
1. Tianjin Cement Industry Design & Research Institute Co.,Ltd.  2. Hubei Key Lab of Road Bridge and Structure Engineering,
Wuhan University of Technology
下载:  PDF (2548KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 以窑尾结构工程为背景,采用SAP2000建立两种有限元模型。通过基于中国规范和美国规范,分析这两种模型的地震作用,比较中国规范和美国规范之间的区别。比较分析表明,两种规范的抗震设防目标、抗震设计原则、荷载组合和反应谱都有较大的区别,美国规范下的地震剪力和层间位移均比中国规范的大。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
潘蜀京
王安阳
申昌俊
薛广文
关键词:  窑尾结构  地震作用  荷载组合  对比分析    
Abstract: Two finite element models are established by using SAP2000 software based on the project of kiln tail structure. Difference between Chinese code and USA code is compared through the analysis of earthquake action of two models according to these two codes. The analytical results indicate that seismic fortification goal, seismic design principle, load combination and response spectrum are quite different between two codes. Earthquake shear and story drift in USA code are both bigger than that in Chinese code.
Key words:  kiln tail structure    earthquake action    load combination    comparison analysis
收稿日期:  2014-11-07                出版日期:  2015-07-25      发布日期:  2018-05-24      整期出版日期:  2015-07-25
TU352.11  
引用本文:    
潘蜀京, 王安阳, 申昌俊, 薛广文.
中美设计规范下窑尾结构地震作用的对比分析
[J]. 水泥技术, 2015, 1(4): 92-95.
Pan Shujing, Wang Anyang, Shen Changjun, Xue Guangwen. Comparison of Earthquake Action for Kiln Tail Structure between Chinese Code and USA Code. Cement Technology, 2015, 1(4): 92-95.
链接本文:  
http://www.cemteck.com/CN/  或          http://www.cemteck.com/CN/Y2015/V1/I4/92
[1] 李苑, 王安阳, 陈庆生, 薛广文.
中美欧荷载规范中窑尾结构风荷载计算方法的对比分析
[J]. 水泥技术, 2015, 1(2): 31-34.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
    PDF Preview