Please wait a minute...
水泥技术, 2020, 1(6): 81-85    doi: 10.19698/j.cnki.1001-6171.20206081
  生产技术 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
水泥熟料岩相分析在生产中的应用浅析
山东山水水泥集团有限公司
Application of Petrographic Analysis of Cement Clinker in Production
Shandong Shanshui Cement Group Co., Ltd.
下载:  PDF (4367KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 介绍了水泥熟料岩相分析的取样方法,主要的研究内容以及适用条件。水泥熟料岩相分析直接使用光学显微镜观测熟料中形成的矿物形态、大小、分布情况及有害成分形态,了解生料配料、生料细度、熟料煅烧和冷却情况,了解窑内煅烧的气氛,观察熟料中氧化镁的形态。影响岩相结构的因素很多,需要结合生产实际具体分析。在实际生产中岩相分析应尽量采取纵向分析,对生产具有更大的指导意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
贾月彩
夏珍珍
冯富宁
关键词:  熟料岩相  矿物形态  煅烧  冷却    
Abstract: This paper introduces the sampling method, main research contents and applicable conditions of cement clinker petrographic analysis. Petrographic analysis of cement clinker directly uses optical microscope to observe the mineral morphology, size, distribution and harmful components in clinker, understand raw material ingredients, raw meal fineness, clinker calcination and cooling, understand the calcination atmosphere in the kiln, observe the morphology of magnesium oxide in clinker, there are many factors affecting the lithofacies structure, which need to be analyzed in combination with the actual production. In the actual production, vertical analysis should be adopted as far as possible in lithofacies analysis, which has greater guiding significance for production.
Key words:  clinker lithofacies    mineral morphology    calcination    cooling
收稿日期:  2020-02-27                出版日期:  2020-11-25      发布日期:  2020-12-07      整期出版日期:  2020-11-25
ZTFLH:  TQ172.16  
引用本文:    
贾月彩, 夏珍珍, 冯富宁.
水泥熟料岩相分析在生产中的应用浅析
[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(6): 81-85.
JIA Yuecai, XIA Zhenzhen, FENG Funing. Application of Petrographic Analysis of Cement Clinker in Production. Cement Technology, 2020, 1(6): 81-85.
链接本文:  
http://www.cemteck.com/CN/10.19698/j.cnki.1001-6171.20206081  或          http://www.cemteck.com/CN/Y2020/V1/I6/81
[1] 尤小平, 陈彬, 周斌, 许广. 2 500t/d水泥熟料生产线冷却机升级新途径[J]. 水泥技术, 2021, 1(1): 21-23.
[2] 王伟, 刘旭月, 李波, 刘薇薇, 潘沛. 二氧化硅性能及对水泥熟料煅烧的影响[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(6): 86-89.
[3] 梁旗.
岩相检验指导水泥熟料煅烧的典型实例
[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(4): 51-54.
[4] 吴涛, 桑圣欢, 祁亚军, 罗超, 钟永超. 水泥厂碳捕集工艺技术[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(4): 90-95.
[5] 邹波, 兰东, 孙泽玖, 林廷全.
LBTF3200型篦冷机技术改造
[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(3): 82-87.
[6] 向东湖.
激光熔覆技术的研究与应用
[J]. 水泥技术, 2020, 1(2): 28-30.
[7] 方鹏.
浅谈辊磨选粉机下部轴承的改造方案
[J]. 水泥技术, 2019, 1(5): 102-104.
[8] 陈远彬.
冷却风机轴承振动案例分析
[J]. 水泥技术, 2019, 1(2): 40-43.
[9] 李会如, 陶瑛, 孙学成, 任鞠萍.
危险废弃物焚烧装置优化配置与应用
[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(6): 96-99.
[10] 王俊杰, 方炎章. 磷石膏生产建筑石膏粉的双温联控煅烧工艺与应用[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(4): 100-103.
[11] 刘志军, 陶瑛, 任鞠萍, 胡建军.
危险废弃物新型热解炉的优化设计与应用
[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(3): 91-93.
[12] 何胜平, 孙国玉. 电石渣制水泥的烧成技术研究与实践[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(2): 91-93.
[13] 宣轶群, 谢志英, 陶金成, 熊忠良, 张平.
国外水泥厂油罐消防系统设计的探讨
[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(5): 58-60.
[14] 吴长亮, 王德涛, 李艳君, 崔倩倩, 刘晓存. 用油砂泥沙配料生产水泥的试验研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(3): 27-31.
[15] 张冠军, 李涛, 詹楠, 刘磊磊. 利用钡盐废渣烧制高强度熟料的研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2016, 1(2): 35-37.
[1] . Review and Prospect of Engineering Practice of Waste Disposal in Cement Kiln in China[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 17 -21 .
[2] DI Dongren, TAO Congxi, CHAI Xingteng. Revision of Cement Energy Consumption Standards and Energy Saving Technology(Ⅰ)[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 22 -26 .
[3] LIU Yonggang, GAO Hongwei, XIAO Guiqing. Design Method of Road Structure Using Lean Concrete Base[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 27 -31 .
[4] LIU Xu, LI Liang. Investigation of New Medium Temperature Wear-resistant Alloy Steel[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 32 -34 .
[5] MA Debao. Finite Element Analysis of Inverted Cone in Raw Meal Silo[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 35 -38 .
[6] HAN Zhongqi. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 38 -48 .
[7] XIE Jianzhong, LIAN Xuewen. Analysis and Solution of Segregation of the Kiln Ash in Continuous Raw Meal Homogenization Silo#br#[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 49 -53 .
[8] GUAN Laiqing, HE Yongxian. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 54 -59 .
[9] JIN Shuang. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 72 -73 .
[10] WANG Qingjiang. Analysis on Mechanical Performance of Typical Joints in Tubular Frame Structure[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 83 -88 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
    PDF Preview