Please wait a minute...
水泥技术, 2026, 1(1): 8-16    doi: 10.19698/j.cnki.1001-6171.20261008
  数字智能 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
管式换热器结构对SCR反应器流场均布特性的影响机制研究
于浩波, 张松, 吴龙杰
中国建材装备集团有限公司合肥中亚环保科技有限公司天津分公司,天津 300133
Study on the Influence Mechanism of Tubular Heat Exchanger Structure on Flow Field Uniformity Characteristics of SCR Reactor
YU Haobo, ZHANG Song, WU Longjie
CNBM Equipment Group, Hefei Zhongya Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. , Tianjin Branch, Tianjin 300133, China
下载:  PDF (8142KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探究管式换热器排列形式对SCR反应器内部流场均布特性的影响,本文采用数值模拟方法,对比分析了六种换热器布置形式下的流场特性,包括空白组(无换热管组)、矩阵管组、错列矩阵管组、交叉排列管组、横向满布管组以及矩阵管组耦合均布板的组合方案。基于Fluent软件对反应器内流场进行仿真,以催化剂入口截面(距催化剂上表面100mm处)的质量均布指数为评价指标,结合Tecplot软件中基于Q准则的涡旋结构可视化分析,揭示了流场分布非均匀性的成因。结果表明:空白组均布指数为0.872;矩阵管组、错列与交叉布置方案均布指数降至0.831~0.853;横向满布管组均布指数为0.892,而矩阵管组耦合均布板方案均布指数最优,其均布指数为0.946。研究证实,单纯依赖换热管结构调整难以实现高效均流,需协同均布装置。综合施工可行性与检修空间需求,横向满布管组耦合均布板的方案为最佳工程解决方案。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
于浩波
张松
吴龙杰
关键词:  SCR反应器  管式换热器  流场均布  数值模拟    
Abstract: To investigate the influence of the arrangement form of tubular heat exchangers on the flow field uniformity characteristics inside the SCR reactor, this study adopts the numerical simulation method to compare and analyze the flow field characteristics under six heat exchanger arrangement forms, including the blank group (without heat exchange tubes), the matrix tube group, the staggered matrix tube group, the cross arrangement tube group, the transversely fully distributed tube group, as well as the combined scheme of matrix tube group and the flow distribution plate. Based on the Fluent software, the flow field inside the reactor is simulated. Taking the mass uniformity index of the catalyst inlet section (100mm above the catalyst surface) as the evaluation index, combined with the vortex structure visualization analysis based on the Q-criterion in Tecplot software, the causes of flow field inhomogeneity are revealed. The results show that the uniformity index of the blank group is 0.872; the uniformity indexes of the matrix tube group, staggered and cross arrangement schemes decrease to the range of 0.831 to 0.853; the uniformity index of the transversely fully distributed tube group is 0.892; while the combined scheme of matrix tube group and flow distribution plate achieves the optimal uniformity index of 0.946. The study confirms that it is difficult to achieve efficient flow equalization merely by adjusting the structure of heat exchange tubes, and it is necessary to coordinate with flow distribution devices. Considering the construction feasibility and maintenance space requirements comprehensively, the scheme of transversely fully distributed tube group - flow distribution plate is the optimal engineering solution.
Key words:  SCR reactor    rubular heat exchanger    flow field uniformity    numerical simulation
收稿日期:  2025-08-19                出版日期:  2026-01-25      发布日期:  2026-01-25      整期出版日期:  2026-01-25
ZTFLH:  TQ172.6  
  X701.7  
作者简介:  于浩波(1982—),男,本科,正高级工程师,主要从事大气污染防治、水处理、危废处置等工作。E-mail:yuhaobo@sinoma-tianjin.cn
引用本文:    
于浩波, 张松, 吴龙杰. 管式换热器结构对SCR反应器流场均布特性的影响机制研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2026, 1(1): 8-16.
YU Haobo, ZHANG Song, WU Longjie. Study on the Influence Mechanism of Tubular Heat Exchanger Structure on Flow Field Uniformity Characteristics of SCR Reactor. Cement Technology, 2026, 1(1): 8-16.
链接本文:  
http://www.cemteck.com/CN/10.19698/j.cnki.1001-6171.20261008  或          http://www.cemteck.com/CN/Y2026/V1/I1/8
[1] 水沛. 分级燃烧与生物质协同掺烧对水泥生产线分解炉内NOX排放特性的影响研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2026, 1(1): 17-24.
[2] 杜佳佳.

不同入窑方式的富氧燃烧效果数值模拟研究 [J]. 水泥技术, 2025, 1(2): 21-27.

[3] 宁波, 喻宏祥, 韩德夫, 马玉震, 孙海全.

大型袋式除尘器边界轮廓法数值模拟及结构优化设计 [J]. 水泥技术, 2024, 1(4): 55-61.

[4] 王炯, 齐树龙. 篦冷机中部取风口流场及温度场数值模拟研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2024, 1(1): 39-44.
[5] 王炯, 齐树龙.

AQC锅炉进风管道保温数值模拟研究 [J]. 水泥技术, 2023, 1(6): 60-67.

[6] 李刚健. 高炉煤气燃烧数值模拟在LOMA-MLB热风炉调试中的应用[J]. 水泥技术, 2023, 1(1): 43-50.
[7] 杜佳佳. 旋流器和喷嘴对燃烧器性能影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2022, 1(1): 27-34.
[8] 豆海建, 秦中华, 王维莉, 柴星腾, 于涛, 赵剑波. 一种U型动叶片选粉机的研究及应用[J]. 水泥技术, 2018, 1(6): 34-39.
[9] 刘秀君, 叶华君. 数值模拟在盘体工艺优化中的应用[J]. 水泥技术, 2017, 1(1): 39-42.
[10] 豆海建, 曾荣, 唐清华, 柴星腾, 聂文海, 申占民. 选粉机三维动态流场数值研究[J]. 水泥技术, 2013, 1(4): 31-34.
[11] 申金永, 姚秀丽, 刘世民. 3300 t/d回转窑稳态热分析及优化[J]. 水泥技术, 2011, 1(1): 36-40.
[12] 华建社, 张成元, 徐德龙, 袁启奇.
立式熟料冷却机内气体流动规律及其影响因素
[J]. 水泥技术, 2008, 1(3): 22-27.
[13] 黄 来, 陆继东, 胡芝娟, 吴君棋, 陶从喜, 彭学平.
旋喷结合分解炉内流场在不同结构和入口条件下的数值模拟
[J]. 水泥技术, 2002, 1(6): 5-8.
[1] . Review and Prospect of Engineering Practice of Waste Disposal in Cement Kiln in China[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 17 -21 .
[2] DI Dongren, TAO Congxi, CHAI Xingteng. Revision of Cement Energy Consumption Standards and Energy Saving Technology(Ⅰ)[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 22 -26 .
[3] LIU Yonggang, GAO Hongwei, XIAO Guiqing. Design Method of Road Structure Using Lean Concrete Base[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 27 -31 .
[4] MA Debao. Finite Element Analysis of Inverted Cone in Raw Meal Silo[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 35 -38 .
[5] HAN Zhongqi. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 38 -48 .
[6] GUAN Laiqing, HE Yongxian. [J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 54 -59 .
[7] WEI Can, ZHANG Yuanyuan, AI Jun. Application of Cement Intelligent Control System in Overseas Projects[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 60 -64 .
[8] WANG Qingjiang. Analysis on Mechanical Performance of Typical Joints in Tubular Frame Structure[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 83 -88 .
[9] LIU Xudong. How to Execute 60 kV Transmission Line EPC Project[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(1): 89 -91 .
[10] YAO Piqiang, HAN Hui, YU Weimin. Study on Calcining and Preliminary Application of New Low Calcium Cement[J]. Cement Technology, 2018, 1(2): 17 -25 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
    PDF Preview